He came, he saw, he lost, and
then he fought and finally conquered.
This one sentence could well surmise
-for those with little, but not dangerous, knowledge of history and modern day
tennis- the trials and travails of tennis’ ‘ex-choker’ Andy Murray.
Till that Monday night in New
York, Murray resembled a long distance runner who, having led the entire race
pulls a hamstring paces ahead of the finish line. The Scot had reached four
Grand Slam finals but ended them on a tearful note going back home with the
runner-up trophy. So regular had been this episode that the inevitable tag of
being a ‘choker’ was becoming an unfair reality. But a marathon final has now
altered equations and Murray can start with renewed vigour having won the
Olympic gold and his first Major.
Given his credentials Murray
is not a one-Slam man. History is replete with surprise winners of one Major-
players, who like a stray lightening on an otherwise calm and breezy day,
surprise us by their sudden emergence and disappearance. Murray has always been
an out an out champion’s material. He is not just a lucky survivor, but the
fierce fighter destined to rule. To elaborate Murray is a potential No. 1 and good
enough to win a bagful of Grand Slams. This is no mere fancy because the golden
era Murray has been part of is bound to see a change of guard very soon.
The larger than life Roger
Federer is slowing down his perfection giving way to unforced errors, even though
on any given day he is the bookmaker’s favourite. Rafael Nadal’s knee is taking
the toll and given his style of play his agility on the baseline can be
affected. So out of the big four, Murray and Novak Djokovic could start a new
rivalry, one that can even rival that between Federer and Nadal.
In this context, Murray’s win
at the Flushing Meadows and breaking the Grand Slam drought were necessary to
get the proverbial monkey off his back. But this is no time to relax either and
Murray’s unit knows it best. His coach, the legendary Ivan Lendl, has already
chalked out plans to take Murray to the top and given the shelf life of a
tennis player’s prime the Scot does not have the time which Federer, Nadal or
Djokovic have had. By 25, that is Murray’s age, Nadal had won 10 Grand Slams
(he won his first in Paris as a 19-year-old), Federer had nine Majors (starting
with the Wimbledon as a 22-year-old) and Djokovic, 25 now, has five (he tasted
Slam success in Melbourne four years back). So in sheer numbers, since they at
times are a measure of greatness, Murray is way behind.
Nonetheless that does not
dampen the spirit either and as Britain’s son of the moment looks ahead he can
at least do so singing heartily, “Say goodbye to the world you thought you live
in.”

Although I did not follow the Finals at Flushing Meadows, I was elated when I heard that Murray had one. I was rooting for him at the Wimbledon finals earlier this year, and was quite chuffed when he returned the compliments to Federer at the Olympics. Somehow, British tennis players have always got my ticker up - I used to be an avid Tim Henman fan.
ReplyDeleteI would probably follow tennis more closely over the next few years than I have done since Sampras' retirement just to see where Murray goes!
And, oh, I like your prose!
Thank you Srini. It's quite a feeling to see somebody commenting. It's like a bonus.
Delete